Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Do you agree with these ANACS grades?

morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
Couple of NEWPS the CC was easy to shoot, the 92 what a batch.
Could not get the look I wanted shooting flat, so I shot the 92 free hand, as well as flat.
What do you think?

image
image
image
image

A shot of the reverse using natural daylight
image
World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO

Comments

  • greghansengreghansen Posts: 4,301 ✭✭✭
    I agree with the 83-CC @ 62. The 92 I can see as 61 or 62. Personally I wouldn't buy a 62 with that big of a dig in the prime focal area, but I'm O.K. with the technical grade.

    Greg Hansen, Melbourne, FL Click here for any current EBAY auctions Multiple "Circle of Trust" transactions over 14 years on forum

  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 5,991 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It may be the photo but the "92 looks a little "off" for whatever reason.
    Many happy BST transactions
  • morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
    <<It may be the photo but the "92 looks a little "off" for whatever reason.>>

    Off as in cleaned, made it into the holder, then toned?
    The more I look at it, the more I don't like it.
    World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
  • WindycityWindycity Posts: 3,540 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Likely properly graded but definitely lacking luster which is often the reason for the 62 grade.
    <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.mullencoins.com">Mullen Coins Website - Windycity Coin website
  • commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭


    << <i>It may be the photo but the "92 looks a little "off" for whatever reason. >>



    image Likely over dipped as the luster seems almost non-existant.

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • robkoolrobkool Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭✭✭
    These appear to be graded very accurately.
  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>These appear to be graded very accurately. >>



    image
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,817 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>These appear to be graded very accurately. >>



    image >>



    Ditto. Claiming it was over-dipped and then retoned based on those pics is a bit of a stretch.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • GrumpyEdGrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭
    I think they're graded right.

    I don't love the look of either but they're ok as 62s. Sort of what I'd expect for the grade.
    Ed
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,810 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm in aggrement that thay are graded correct but I suspect that the 92 would be market adjusted downward for negative eye appeal if sent in.
    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • This content has been removed.
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the 83cc much better than the 92. The 92 has weakness in the luster and at least in these photos, "seems" to have some features of an AU58 coin.
    The 83-cc is a solid looking 62 with "63" quality fields. The 83cc could be technically called MS62/64 or 62+/64. I'm surprised they share the same assigned grade.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • "The 92 has weakness in the luster and at least in these photos, "seems" to have some features of an AU58 coin." - RR

    image

    Eric
  • IrishMikeyIrishMikey Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭
    I agree with the others. I think both are accurately graded as MS-62, but the CC is
    definitely the more attractive coin. Many 1892 P mint Morgan dollars tend to be a bit
    drab, especially when compared to a CC.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file